ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic indirectly resulted in missed therapeutic opportunities for many diseases. Here we focus on community-acquired respiratory viruses other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) [respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza and influenza A], and highlight the pandemics impact on clinical trials to develop novel therapies for other severe respiratory viral infections. We retrospectively reviewed inclusion rates within respiratory antiviral clinical trials in comparison with all other clinical trials in our clinical investigations center, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. As opposed to the remaining clinical trials developed within our unit, respiratory antiviral trials inclusion rates did not recover after the initial recruitment decrease observed across all trials during the first pandemic wave. These results were discussed in the context of non-COVID-19 respiratory viral infection rates within our center, showing a general decline in seasonal respiratory viruses spread since the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Virus epidemiology changes upon the wide SARS-CoV-2 expansion as well as the lifestyle changes globally adopted to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission could have therefore contributed to the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antiviral drug development. Our study highlights the peculiarity of respiratory antiviral drug development during the COVID-19 pandemic era and describes potential explanations for such drug development halting.
ABSTRACT
Context: Pegcetacoplan (PEG) is a C3 complement inhibitor recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). PEG was superior to eculizumab (ECU;C5-inhibitor) in improving hemoglobin levels at week 16 during the phase 3 PEGASUS trial (NCT03500549) in patients with suboptimal response to prior ECU treatment. Objective: We report on efficacy and safety of PEG and results from a post hoc time-aligned analysis based on start of PEG dosing. Design: Eighty PNH patients (≥18 years, hemoglobin levels <10.5 g/dL despite stable ECU treatment [≥3 months]) were enrolled. Following a 4-week run-in, patients were randomized (1:1) to PEG or ECU monotherapy for the randomized controlled period (RCP) through week 16, before initiating an open-label period (OLP) through week 48, where ECU patients completed a second run-in before switching to PEG monotherapy (ECU-to-PEG), and PEG patients continued PEG monotherapy (PEG-to-PEG). Key endpoints included change from baseline (CFB) in hemoglobin levels and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Timepoints were manually aligned based on start of PEG dosing (PEG-to-PEG: day 1;ECU-to-PEG: week 20) to compare changes in hemoglobin levels between groups. Results: PEG-to-PEG patients achieved sustained improvements in hemoglobin levels at week 16 through the OLP (week 48 mean hemoglobin level: 11.3 g/dL;CFB: 2.5 g/dL). ECU-to-PEG patients displayed improved hemoglobin levels during the OLP (week 48 mean hemoglobin level: 11.6 g/dL;CFB: 2.9 g/dL). Timepoint alignment demonstrated no significant difference (p=0.64) between improvements in hemoglobin levels at 28 and 48 weeks among PEG-to-PEG and ECU-to-PEG groups, respectively. Thirty percent of patients reported a serious AE, 6% possibly PEG-related. Common AEs for PEG-treated patients were injection site reactions (36%), hemolysis (24%), and diarrhea (21%). Twelve patients (15%) discontinued PEG due to AEs: 3 in RCP, 8 in OLP, 1 during follow-up, including one death due to COVID-19, unrelated to PEG. Conclusions: PEG-treated patients experienced sustained improvements in hemoglobin levels at week 48, and the safety profile of PEG was consistent with previously reported data. The treatment effect of PEG on hemoglobin levels over time was similar between PEG-to-PEG and ECU-to-PEG groups. Thus, PEG represents a new effective therapeutic option for PNH patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Clinical Investigations Center of Saint-Louis Hospital (CIC-1427) is a structure dedicated to clinical trials and mainly early phase trials (first-in-man administration, phase 1 and 2). These trials are conducted in a French Regional Health Agency (ARS) authorized structure. In March 2020, faced to the global COVID-19 pandemic and the French national lockdown measures, the CIC-1427 had to rapidly adapt its operating procedures to ensure the safety of both patients and staff. STUDY OBJECTIVE: Ensuring optimal management of patients included in early phase clinical trials, while respecting the good clinical and professional practices (GCP/GPP) of the CICs protocol sponsors' requirements, patients' safety and clinical research multidisciplinary staff safety (nurses, caregivers' assistants (AS), clinical research assistants (CRA), clinical trial coordinators (CTC), project leaders, health executive and investigating physicians), in the context of the health crisis related to COVID-19. METHODS AND RESULTS: Due to their activity, requiring on-site presence, each staff member of the CIC-1427 clinical research team had to adapt their daily activity to the constraints of the health crisis. New specific procedures were quickly developed to deal with the pandemic. Most of the on-site medical visits were replaced by virtual consults with biological assessments in the local laboratories. "Remote monitoring" replaced on-site monitoring visits. Treatments were sent to each patient's home via couriers after agreement of the CPPs of each protocol (Committee for the Protection of Persons). The essential visits were maintained on site thanks to the unfailing involvement of our clinical care team, with implementation of a specific sanitary protocol. CONCLUSION: The involvement of our entire multidisciplinary research team ensured that each patient was able to benefit from a personalized follow-up and to continue the treatment on-trial. The newly introduced procedures also allowed collection of a maximum of safety and efficacy data for clinical trial sponsors while complying with good regulatory practices. This set of procedures developed during the first epidemic wave, fundamentally helped setting the frame for a better coping during the subsequent pandemic waves.